Hier finden Sie Literatur, die sich mit GWP-relevanten Aspekten im Themenbereich der „Publikationspraxis“ auseinandersetzt.
Handreichungen
Handreichung zu Predatory Journals: In dieser Handreichung, erstellt von Katrin Frisch, Mitarbeiterin der Dialogforen, werde die Phänomene „Predatory Journals“ und „Predatory Conferences“ erläutert und praktische Tipps zur Bewertung und zum Umgang gegeben. Die Handreichung richtet sich an Forschende und Ombudspersonen.
Allgemein
Wissenschaftliches Publizieren als Grundlage und Gestaltungsfeld der Wissenschaftsbewertung. Herausforderungen und Handlungsfelder (Positionspapier der Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)/AG Publikationswesen, 2022).
Systematic Manipulation of the Publication Process (COPE Council, Version 2, 2021) https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.23
ICMJE Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing, and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, 2024).
Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing (erstellt und herausgegeben durch The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly Publishing Association (OASPA), and the World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), Version 4, 2022).
Preprints
Preprints (Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE), 2018). https://doi.org/10.24318/R4WByao2
To preprint or not to preprint: A global researcher survey (Rong Ni, Ludo Waltman; J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 75 2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24880
Leitfaden zur Unterscheidung von Preprints und Postprints (erstellt vom Digital Repository der Iowa State University, 2013).
Accelerating scholarly communication: The transformative role of preprints (Chiarelli, Andrea; Pinfield, Stephen; Johnson, Rob; Richens, Emma; Knowledge Exchange, Zenodo, 2019). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3357727
Open Policy Finder (vorher: Search Sherpa Services bzw. Sherpa Romeo und Sherpa Juliet): Datenbank zum Durchsuchen von Journal Policies bezüglich Preprints, Selfarchiving und Open Access. https://openpolicyfinder.jisc.ac.uk
Predatory Journals
Is MDPI a predatory publisher? (Paolo Crosetto; WordPress, 2021).
How Reliable and Useful Is Cabell’s Blacklist ? A Data-Driven Analysis (Dony, Christophe, Maurane Raskinet, François Renaville, Stéphanie Simon, and Paul Thirion; LIBER Quarterly: The Journal of the Association of European Research Libraries 30 (1), 2020). https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10339
Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature (Tove Faber Frandsen; Learned Publishing, Vol 32, 2019). https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1214
Predatory Journals: No Definition, No Defence (Grudniewicz, Agnes; Moher, David; Cobey, Kelly D.; Bryson, Gregory L.; Cukier, Samantha; Allen, Kristiann; Ardern, Clare; Balcom, Lesley; Barros, Tiago; Berger, Monica; Ciro, Jairo Buitrago; Cugusi, Lucia; Donaldson, Michael R.; Egger, Matthias; Graham, Ian D.; Hodgkinson, Matt; Khan, Karim M.; Mabizela, Mahlubi; Manca, Andrea; Milzow, Katrin; Mouton, Johann; Muchenje, Marvelous; Olijhoek, Tom; Ommaya, Alexander; Patwardhan, Bhushan; Poff, Deborah; Proulx, Laurie; Rodger, Marc; Severin, Anna; Strinzel, Michaela; Sylos-Labini, Mauro; Tamblyn, Robyn; van Niekerk, Marthie; Wicherts, Jelte M.; Lalu, Manoj M; Nature, Vol 576, 2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03759-y
Combatting Predatory Academic Journals and Conferences (Bericht des The InterAcademy Partnership (IAP) 2022)
Stop this Waste of People, Animals and Money (Moher, David; Shamseer, Larissa; Cobey, Kelly D.; Lalu, Manoj M.; Galipeau, James; Avey, Marc T.; Ahmadzai, Nadera; Alabousi, Mostafa; Barbeau, Pauline; Beck, Andrew; Daniel, Raymond; Frank, Robert; Ghannad, Mona; Hamel, Candyce; Hersi, Mona; Hutton, Brian; Isupov, Inga; McGrath, Trevor A.; McInnes, Matthew D. F.; Page, Matthew J.; Pratt, Misty; Pussegoda, Kusala; Shea, Beverley; Srivastava, Anubhav; Stevens, Adrienne; Thavorn, Kednapa; van Katwyk, Sasha; Ward, Roxanne; Wolfe, Dianna; Yazdi, Fatemeh; Yu, Ashley M.; Ziai, Hedyeh; Nature, Vol 549, 2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/549023a
Auswertung einer Umfrage zur Wahrnehmung des Open-Access-Verlags MDPI an der Universität Kassel (Tobias Pohlmann, 2023). https://doi.org/10.17170/kobra-202304057786
Paper Mills
Paper mills: A novel form of publishing malpractice affecting psychology (Anna Abalkina, Dorthy Bishop; Meta-Psychology, vol 7, 2023). https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2022.3422
Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21st century—how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills? (Jennifer A. Byrne, Jana Christopher; FEBS Lett, 594, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/1873-3468.13747
Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills (Jennifer A. Byrne, Yasunori Park, Reese A. K. Richardson, Pranujan Pathmendra, Mengyi Sun, Thomas Stoeger; Nucleic Acids Research, Volume 50, Issue 21, 2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkac1139
Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature (Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé; Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(12), 2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24495
Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals (Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, Alexander Magazinov; ArXiv, 2021). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751
Problematic Paper Screener, entwickelt von Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, Alexander Magazinov: https://www.irit.fr/~Guillaume.Cabanac/problematic-paper-screener;
dazugehörige Publikation: Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., & Magazinov, A. (2022). The ‘Problematic Paper Screener’ automatically selects suspect publications for post-publication (re)assessment. Preprint; Arxiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2210.04895
Hijacked Journals
Challenges posed by hijacked journals in Scopus (Anna Abalkina, J Assoc Inf Sci Technol. 75, 2024) https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24855
Improper legitimization of hijacked journals through citations (Anna Abalkina, Guillaume Cabanac, Cyril Labbé, Alexander Magazinov; ArXiv, 2022). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2209.04703
Hijacked Journals: An Emerging Challenge for Scholarly Publishing (Mehdi Dadkhah, Glenn Borchardt; Aesthetic Surgery Journal, Volume 36, Issue 6, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjw026
Masquerade of authority: hijacked journals are gaining more credibility than original ones (Hegedűs, M., Dadkhah, M. & Dávid, L; Diagnosis, 11(3), 2024). https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0082
Retraction Watch Hijacked Journal Checker: https://retractionwatch.com/the-retraction-watch-hijacked-journal-checker/
Photo by Bank Phrom via Unsplash